Get in touch

Electro-sinter-forging

ESF: the fastest materials production technology on the market

eForging, or Electro-sinter-forging (ESF), is an advanced manufacturing process that combines elements of powder metallurgy and traditional forging with field assisted sintering (FAST). Combining a single fast high current discharge with a mechanical pulse, eForging is the newest and fastest industrial field assisted sintering technology. Developed and patented by EPoS, this novel manufacturing technology allow us to produce in a lean and rapid way a wide variety of metals and metal composites.
Watch video Watch video

Advantages

Enhanced properties

The rapid heating and cooling cycles, combined with the applied pressure, result in fine microstructures and enhanced properties due to the possibility to design completely new alloys and composites.

Reduced processing time

ESF can significantly reduce the time required to produce high-strength and precise parts compared to conventional sintering and forging or machining processes.

Material efficiency

ESF typically results in less material waste, as the powder material is used efficiently and any excess can often be recycled.

Low energy consumption

The energy usage per component is significantly lower compared to methods like Spark Plasma Sintering and Hot Pressing.

More innovative than Additive Manufacturing. More efficient than Direct Hot Pressing. Faster than Spark Plasma Sintering.

Why we are different?

Comparison with Spark Plasma Sintering

Direct comparison with Spark Plasma Sintering has been made on a nano-crystalline iron alloy to compare the characteristics of the two processes (“Dislocation configurations in nanocrystalline FeMo sintered components” – P.Scardi, M.D’Incau, M.Leoni and A.Fais, Met.Mat.Trans.A DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-9987-x. Besides the differences in processing time (a hundreds of milliseconds in ESF compared to minutes of SPS) and in automation required (ESF has the simplicity of a press whereas SPS requires robots for the handling of the molds and the extraction of the components) there are substantial diversities in the characteristics of the materials produced: microstructurally finer (see figure 1) and harder (see figure 2) materials are the result of the highly metastable ESF/CDS process whereas bi-modal, softer materials are produced with SPS.

Fig. 1

Figure 1: EBSD maps of (a) and (c) CDS and (b) and (d) SPS Fe-1.5 % Mo components. (c) and (d) Local misorientation maps refer to the regions in the inset of the upper pictures.

Fig. 2

Figure 2: Micro-Hardness Vickers 300 gf versus Density for CDSed (black crossed) ans SPSed (red circles) Fe-1.5%Mo components.

Comparison with Spark Plasma Sintering

Not much dissimilar to Spark Plasma Sintering, but much more common in industrial practice due to the simplicity of the system employed, comparisons with Direct Hot Pressing, DHP have been performed on the side of energetic efficiency (“Advancements in single pulse electric current assisted sintering” A.Fais, EuroPM 2013 Congress Proceedings. Cobalt-diamond metal matrix composites for granite cutting were produced with ESF and the energy employed was calculated and compared to DHP.

See in the example aside how ESF employs less than 6% of the energy of DHP.

Direct
Hot
Pressing

#100
20×10.3.8 mm segments

150 kW machine

10 min at full power

3 MJ / segment = 250 Wh / piece

Electro Sintering Forging

#1
20×10.3.8 mm segments

48 kJ charged on bank

3 MJ / segment = 250 Wh / piece

Tell us about your project or ask for more information